Haliviq

Quality That Scales
With Your Release Speed

Teams that ship every week cannot wait for a test phase at the end. Haliviq puts QA engineers inside your sprints, next to your developers, to write automated tests that run on every commit, set the release gates that decide whether a build goes out, and keep the suite healthy as the product grows. It suits product teams in Bangkok and across Thailand who release often and want to stop trading speed for stability. We work on a monthly retainer or as an embedded team for a defined period.

We treat quality as a product capability, not a checkpoint before shipping. Our QA engineers join your team and start with a risk-based test strategy: which journeys earn the most revenue, which ones break most often, and where a failure hurts most. Then we build CI-integrated automation across unit, API and end-to-end layers using tools such as Playwright, Cypress and Jest, add performance and security checks, and define release gates your team agrees on. Exploratory testing by people who understand the product covers what scripts cannot. Every release produces a short report that tells developers what to fix, not a dashboard nobody opens.

Capabilities

Key Capabilities

Concrete capabilities we bring to this engagement — not buzzwords.

Test Automation

Unit, API and end-to-end suites wired into CI, so every pull request is checked before it merges. We start with sign-up, payment and the main back-office flows, then widen coverage each sprint instead of attempting everything on day one.

Performance & Load

Load, stress and soak tests against traffic shaped like your real users, repeated before launches and big campaigns. The output is a capacity limit in plain numbers and a short list of the slowest parts to fix.

Security Testing

SAST and DAST scans, dependency checks and targeted manual tests aligned with your threat model, running in the pipeline. Findings arrive with a severity level and a suggested fix.

Exploratory QA

Human-led testing for edge cases, UX friction and unusual combinations of settings that automation cannot cover alone. Done by testers who learn your product, so they know what normal looks like.

Actionable Reporting

A short summary after every release cycle and defects filed in your tracker with steps to reproduce, severity and evidence, so developers can start fixing without asking follow-up questions.

Continuous Improvement

We watch flaky tests, run time and coverage release by release, and fix root causes, so the suite stays fast, trusted and aimed at the places where bugs really appear.

Tools We Use

Technologies We Use

Proven testing tools we apply where they fit — chosen for the problem, not the trend cycle.

PlaywrightCypressJestVitestSeleniumk6PostmanOWASP ZAPBrowserStack

How We Work

Our Approach

A clear path from strategy to a suite the team trusts — adjusted per codebase, never one-size-fits-all.

01

Planning

Risk-based strategy: what to automate, what to test by hand

02

Test Design

Cases, realistic data and a visible coverage map

03

Automation

Stable CI pipelines and suites that are easy to maintain

04

Execution

Regression on every change, exploratory on new features

05

Reporting

Defects with steps to reproduce, plus a release summary

06

Improve

Fewer flaky tests, faster runs, coverage where bugs appear

FAQ

Straight answers about how we test.

Automated and exploratory testing built into the delivery process: unit and integration tests, end-to-end suites, performance testing and security scanning. Our QA engineers work inside your sprints, so quality keeps pace with release speed instead of slowing it down.

Playwright, Cypress, Jest and Vitest for functional and end-to-end testing, k6 for performance, OWASP ZAP for security scanning and BrowserStack for cross-device coverage. We pick the toolset that fits your existing stack rather than pushing a fixed list on every project.

Yes. We start with the highest-risk user journeys, build an end-to-end safety net first, and then push coverage down into integration and unit tests as the suite earns trust, rather than trying to write every test on day one.

Both. Exploratory testing by people who understand the product finds what scripts miss: confusing flows, visual glitches, edge cases nobody thought to script. We combine it with automation rather than choosing one over the other.

A focused audit of your highest-risk flows and a prioritised coverage plan takes 1-2 weeks. Building the initial automated suite for a mid-size product typically runs 4-8 weeks. After that the suite grows a little with every release instead of needing another big push.

It scales with the size of the codebase and the depth of coverage you need. A focused test-strategy audit starts in the low five figures (THB). An initial automation build-out for one product area typically starts in the mid five figures. Ongoing QA support is quoted as a monthly retainer sized to your release cadence.

The opposite, once the suite is in place. A CI-integrated suite runs in minutes on every commit, so teams ship with more confidence and more often. The slowdown people associate with testing usually comes from manual regression cycles, which is exactly what automation replaces.

We treat a flaky test as a defect in the suite, not something to retry until it goes green. We track the flake rate and fix root causes such as timing issues, shared state and environment differences, so the team keeps trusting the suite instead of ignoring it.

A pre-launch audit checks a product at one point in time and ends with a sign-off. This service is ongoing: QA engineers sit with your developers, automation runs on every change and release gates stay in place. If you only need a check before go-live, our QA and testing service is the better fit.

Have a project in mind?

We'd love to hear what you're building.